The New Black Atheists
Christianity has played a central role in African-American life from the late 18th century to the present. Black churches raised funds for fugitive slaves, served as schoolhouses, and provided space for political meetings and activities, among other functions. Leaders of black congregations such as Richard Allen or Daniel Payne were often leaders of the broader black community. The spiritual messages of redemption and justice appealed to a people who experienced the brutality of slavery and the indignities of Jim Crow segregation laws. However, while many black churches were radical advocates for political and economic equality, others remained conservative institutions that failed to challenge the status quo. This conservatism helped give rise to an increasingly vocal and influential group of African Americans – the new black atheists.
Who are the new black atheists and what is behind their recent growth? First, let’s briefly look at the ‘old’ black atheists.
As long as people have proclaimed the existence of God, others have rejected the idea of a deity. Among African Americans, the earliest evidence of atheism and agnosticism comes from 19th-century slave narratives. Peter Randolph’s Sketches of Slave Life (1855) and Austin Steward’s Twenty-Two Years a Slave (1857), for example, posit that the brutality of slavery drove many blacks to become atheists. Likewise, prevalent proslavery religion turned many enslaved blacks away from Christianity and religion in general.
The Union victory in the Civil War and passage of the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution abolishing slavery convinced many skeptical blacks that perhaps a just God was indeed looking out for their interests. But the nation’s retreat from reconstruction, from protecting the rights of its black citizens, and the onset of Jim Crow, gave new life to black atheism, which grew sharply in the early 20th century.
This growth coincided with the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s and ’30s. Urbanisation, technological advancements and growing opportunities for education promoted secularism among black intellectuals such as Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston, Nella Larsen and Richard Wright. This secularism included atheism but also a commitment to improving human life through reason rather than faith. The Renaissance did not precipitate black atheism so much as foster the rise of an increasingly self-conscious secular community. Rather than attend church on Sunday mornings, black freethinkers gathered in A. Philip Randolph’s parlour in Harlem to discuss socialism, labour politics, anti-imperialism and solutions to the race problem.
This early secular community differs from the new black atheists of today in their acceptance of Christianity and their lack of evangelical zeal to promote atheism. Black freethinkers such as Hurston and Hughes did not wish to disabuse black Christians of their religious ideals. They simply felt that religion was not for them. Hubert Harrison, a black socialist freethinker in Harlem during the 1910s and ’20s was an exception. He saw it as his duty to bring freethought to African Americans, whom he believed should be most desirous of jettisoning Christianity because the religion had historically strengthened both slavery and Jim Crow.
Black freethinkers also played significant roles in the Civil Rights movement. Its leaders such as James Forman, Eldridge Cleaver and Stokely Carmichael rejected Christianity, which they associated with Martin Luther King, Jr’s strategies of nonviolent resistance. Notably, however, the 1960s generation saw themselves as political activists first and freethinkers second.
It was only in the 1990s that black freethinkers began to build their own institutions. For decades, many had participated in the Ethical Culture movement, in Unitarian Universalism, or other organisations hospitable to freethought. The Black Panther Party for Self-Defense and the American Humanist Association were also notably not Christian. But it wasn’t until 1989, when Norm Allen, Jr founded African Americans for Humanism, that there was an explicitly secular organisation for blacks. Black Atheists of America and, more recently, Black Nonbelievers Inc, as well as local groups such as Black Skeptics Los Angeles, soon followed.
New black atheists are not content to personally reject religion but instead have a goal of spreading freethought to the broader black community. For example, the author Sikivu Hutchinson and the founder of Black Nonbelievers, Mandisa Thomas, argue that religion hurts the black community by promoting sexism, patriarchy and homophobia. They claim that black churches have failed to address drug addiction, housing inequities, health disparities, lack of employment opportunities and other pressing social problems facing black Americans. Rather than adopting religious solutions such as abstinence-only education to a problem such as teenage pregnancies, black atheists call for more sex education and access to birth control.
Today, new black atheists are more likely than ever to be women. While there have been prominent black women freethinkers such as Hurston, Larsen and Alice Walker, until recently it had been much more likely for men to openly embrace skepticism, rather than women. New black atheists reject the politics of respectability that have held sway in the black community since the early 1900s. These politics demand that black women must be chaste, temperate, industrious and socially conservative. Above all, they must be religious. They must always portray the race in the best light.
With women leading the contemporary freethought movement, the politics of respectability and its sometimes anti-feminist tendencies are being undermined. As Hutchinson notes in her book Moral Combat (2011), ‘for many black atheist women, atheism’s appeal lies in its deconstruction of the bankrupt mores, values and ideologies that prop up patriarchy, sexism, heterosexism, racism, white supremacy, imperialism and economic injustice’.
Feminism is an essential part of the new black atheists’ humanism. New black atheists think that it is not enough to deny the existence of God, teach evolution in schools or fight for the separation of church and state. They want to bring worldly solutions to practical problems. Many have embraced Black Lives Matter (BLM), a secular movement that is notably unaffiliated with black religious institutions and ideology. In doing so, they believe they will improve the lot of blacks in particular but also promote a more just, democratic and less racist American society.
As the black atheist Sincere Kirabo posits of BLM: ‘There’s a social activist movement underway continuing the unfinished business of the Civil Rights movement era. Want to make a difference? What we need is grit and involvement in the struggle, not a tribe satisfied with the empty promises of scriptural white noise. Please, for the sake and love of our own futures: abandon your fabled white messiah. Wake up. We are our own salvation.’
*This article was originally published on Aeon.
Chris Cameron is an Associate Professor of History at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. His research and teaching interests are in African American and early American history, especially abolitionist thought, liberal religion, and secularism. His first book is entitled To Plead Our Own Cause: African Americans in Massachusetts and the Making of the Antislavery Movement (Kent State University Press, 2014). Follow him on Twitter @ccamrun2.
Copyright © AAIHS. May not be reprinted without permission.
Thanks for this article. I moved from the North East to America’s deep South and have found myself not only embracing the non-Christian roots of my ancestors, but wondering how Christianity is so completely woven into the fiber of the southern African American way of life. Living in a small town I witness a sense of supportive community among the white residents that I don’t see with Blacks in the area.
I found you so eloquently expressed your insight into freethinkers within the civil rights movement, and I believe we need more knowledgeable freethinkers to help us craft the direction of the “new” civil rights movement, but this time with an ultimate goal in sight. We dropped this ball the first time around-we cannot let that happen again.
Enjoyed the post, Chris, and look forward to reading the full book. I think you are absolutely right about the intersection of feminism, humanism, and the new black atheism. I wonder what your thoughts are on how the new black atheists use literature to express ideas and convictions? Or how you historicize their creative writings? I used Hutchinson’s White Nights, Black Paradise to great effect in my American religion class earlier in the spring, and framed it to discuss post-WW2 new religious movements, African American religion, humanism, etc. Also, I wonder how your larger project addresses atheism and/or humanism in rap? Here I’m thinking of the Dead Prez song “No Way As the Way” from their 2012 record Information Age. Look forward to more of your posts on this topic.
Thank you for reading and for these questions Phil. In the early twentieth century, literature was probably the most important tool freethinkers used to explore many of the themes in this piece. It allowed for a freedom of expression and creativity unavailable in newspaper articles or other forms of writing. I’ll be using one of the most important early sources in this tradition next semester, Nella Larsen’s Quicksand. Other great texts include Richard Wright’s The Outsider, and to a lesser extent Native Son. And I just learned of two other novels that look at black secularism–Ernest Gaines’s Bloodline and Ravi Howard’s Like Trees, Walking. My current project ends at the Civil Rights Movement but my next project will include a chapter on rap and freethought, including Dead Prez, Greyson Square, Slaughterhouse, and others.
Great article, Chris!
We’re appreciative of your analysis on this important topic of black atheism. However, You seem to converge freethinking and atheism, and the article seems to place Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston under both traditions. While both Hurston and Hughes were (theistic) freethinkers, they were not atheists. There’s also a difference between theistic humanism and nontheistic humanism, and radical black secularism or black radical humanism does not always mean a rejection of theism.
Thanks,
Celucien L. Joseph (“Dr. Lou”)
Thank you for reading the piece Celucien. You are of course right in these critiques. I had limited space in the original Aeon piece and had to republish the text exactly so could not elaborate in certain areas. Atheists are freethinkers but not all freethinkers are atheists. In my recent article in the Journal of Africana Religions I explore in a bit more depth Hurston’s freethought. I’m not sure I would call her a theistic freethinker, however. In my reading of her autobiography and anthropological works, she seems more of an agnostic/deist. She is unsure of God’s existence at times but then posits if there is a God, he is likely not concerned with human life. Hughes also seems to be very ambivalent about God’s existence early on in his career and until publishing The Big Sea in 1940. Sometimes he posits God’s nonexistence and other times God’s powerlessness and even malevolence towards black people. Neither can